Contribution of the human relations movement

By acquiring these skills, the employees, those in management positions, and the customer can maintain more compatible relationships. Elton Mayo stressed the following: Taylorism, founded by Frederick W. Dennison demonstrated an activist concern both with the rationale and character of workers, and with the control and management undertaken by managers of the business enterprise.

Although some more specific goals and outcomes of each movement were different, each, broadly speaking, aimed to advance the workplace and create a coherent group of individuals, while still maintaining a hierarchical system with managers in control.

Taylorsought to apply science to the management of employees in the workplace in order to gain economic efficiency through labour productivity. The development of high quality leadership to communicate goals and to ensure effective and coherent decision making. The widely perceived view of human relations is said to be one that completely contradicts the traditional views of Taylorism.

Secondly, Taylor purported to introduce specific quantitative goals to individual employees in order to provide challenging time restraints and thus increasing productivity. In doing so, employees are supposed to gain an identity, stability within their job and job satisfactionwhich in turn make them more willing to co-operate and contribute their efforts towards accomplishing organisational goals.

The “Hawthorne Effect”

The one time president of the Taylor Society has been linked to both Taylorist principles as well human relation ideals thus creating a nexus between Taylorism and human relation thought.

Firstly, scientific management aimed to reduce inefficiency through studying the time and motions in work tasks. Whilst scientific management tries to apply science to the workforce, the accepted definition of human relations suggests that management should treat workers as individuals, with individual needs.

Bruce and Nyland suggest that many academics preceded Mayo in identifying a concept similar to that of the human relations movement even going as far to suggest that the output and information collected by the Hawthorne investigations was identified well before Mayo by Taylor.

The notion of Taylorism was supportive of improvement in pay and conditions in workplaces under the proviso that workers were paid in accordance to their output.

Its aim was to address the social welfare needs of workers and therefore elicit their co-operation as a workforce. The power of natural groups, in which social aspects take precedence over functional organizational structures.

What is the Human Relations Movement?

The teaching of these skills to employees is referred to as "soft skills" training. Nonetheless, although Taylorism attempted to justify scientific management as a holistic philosophy, rather than a set of principles, the human relations movement worked parallel to the notion of scientific management.

In essence, both view points sought to make the workplace a more efficient and worker-friendly place. The human relations movement supported the primacy of organizations to be attributed to natural human groupings, communication and leadership.

The object of time studies was to determine how fast a job should and could be done. Taylorism and scientific management entailed to be a "complete mental revolution" and as Taylor explained, Taylorism sought to encourage managers and labourers to "take their eyes off of the division of the surplus as the important matter, and together turn their attention toward increasing the size of the surplus.

The theoretical goals of human relations were no different from those of Taylorism. The need for reciprocal communication, in which communication is two way, from worker to chief executive, as well as vice versa.

Most importantly, Taylor sought to increase productivity through organization of behaviour.Human Relations Movement definition The human relations movement was founded by sociologist George Elton Mayo in the s following a series of experiments known as the Hawthorne studies, which focused on exploring the link between employee satisfaction/wellbeing and workplace productivity.

The Human Relations Movement:

The Human Relations Movement viewed people as driven by both economic and social needs. It attempted to approach the subject of organisational management psychologically. The theory was based upon increased productivity and employee satisfaction as a result of increased management concern for employee welfare and individual attention.

Human relations movement

The human relations movement also had three major limitations: In viewing human factors as the single most important organizational variable it committed the mistakes of earlier theories, searching for one best way of managing%(3).

Harvard Business School’s role in the experiments represented a milestone in the dawn of the human relations movement and a shift in the study of management from a scientific to a.

Elton Mayo, who was called “the founder of both the Human Relations Movement and of industrial sociology” (Pugh & Hickson,P), had the basic idea that “workers had strong social needs which they tried to satisfy through membership of informal social.

Harvard’s role in the Hawthorne experiments gave rise to the modern application of social science to organization life and lay the foundation for the human relations movement and the field of organizational behavior (the study of organizations as social systems) pioneered by George Lombard, Paul Lawrence, and others.

Download
Contribution of the human relations movement
Rated 0/5 based on 85 review